The Flood: Not Global, Barely Local, Mostly Theological, II
By Falk, Darrel | March 10, 2010 | Category: BioLogos Features
Meyer and Ayala have very different views about what science has to say about the origin of genetic information. Meyer believes the scientific data clearly demonstrate that genetic information has arisen through the intervention of an intelligent agent. Ayala sees it differently. The Intelligent Design movement, as Ayala sees it, is deeply flawed at both the theological and scientific level.
Comments (25)
March 10, 2010 | Category: Video Blogs
In this video conversation, Old Testament scholar Peter Enns discusses the Apostle Paul and his understanding of Adam as the progenitor of the human race. While in Paul’s mind, there may be an “organic” connection, Enns points out that for most Christians, this has no bearing on the “literalness” of Jesus.
Comments (42)
By Enns, Pete | March 9, 2010 | Category: BioLogos Features
In my experience, a lot of Christians have come to some peace with all of this. They may handle it in different ways, and some may not have arrived at a conclusion, but they at least recognize that something has to be done. They sense that a simple literal reading of the Adam story won’t work without creating a lot of cognitive dissonance, and so they are open to ideas. But, sooner or later, another issue comes up that is hard to get around and for some simply ends the discussion entirely: Paul.
Comments (62)
By Meyer, Stephen C. | March 8, 2010 | Category: Guest Features
At the end of last year, Darrel Falk posted his reflections on Stephen Meyer’s book, Signature in the Cell. Francisco Ayala, who is one of the most respected evolutionary biologists alive today was asked to respond to the concerns Falk had raised. Meyer was offered an opportunity to respond to Falk's reflections as well. He accepted, and expressed a desire to respond to Ayala also. Today we post Part 1 of his response.
Comments (31)
March 7, 2010 | Category: BioLogos Reflections
Science can tell us how flowers bloom and how the sun rises and sets each day. Science has even begun to give us insight into the processes that may have brought about life itself - processes that seem to go against the idea of a literalist six day interpretation of Genesis. Does such knowledge mean we cannot look upon these natural wonders and experience the same awe of our Creator, as described in the verses above?
Comments (4)
